Comparison of two car advertisements

In this essay I plan to compare two automobile publicizingisements. virtuoso of which is about a large car, the other, a sm both car. In a year millions of pounds are spent on pay heedising so from that it is loose to accept that a car ad will cost a cud of money.Advertisement 1 has a embodiment of a Volkswagen Boulevard, veneering towards the reader with three stereotypical cleaning ladies draped over the car in a humours fashion. The copy is presented below the frame with a shibboleth that uses both humour and rhyme. The frame does non let you see the post of the car, and the copy uses a range of print sizes. The print contains twelve condensed paragraphs.The advert is from the Sunday Times, which is a respectable broadsheet newspaper the advert takes up a whole page, which is an A3 sized piece of paper.Advertisement 2 shows a large blue Volvo Estast in the countryside, surrounded by rocks mourning band and trees. A woman and a man are standing behind(predicate) the car unpacking or packing a hiking kit. The car is shown from the back with the beef open.The rocks and the scenery are presented like this to show that the car can be used on other landscapes the colour of the car also blends in with the scenery, as it is a natural blue. The rocks suggest that the car is rugged, strong, and long lasting, which gives a positive view towards the Volvo. The alloy wheels give it a sporty viewpoint, which is support up with the copy performance cars. Volvos are well known for their safety and this is also subconsciously shown by the red lights on the back of the car, the helmet and all the other hiking equipment that is used for safety, like the ropes. The man acts as if he owns the car, he stands at the back dominantly as he stands he seems to be taking charge, he is closer to the car from this point you can see that the advert is obviously aimed towards the male sense of hearing. The boot of the car is open to show that on that point is lots of space, the amount of space is also shown by the angle the frame is shown at this can make the car look bigger than it really is.Advertisement 1 obviously has women as its target audience as they produce not used glamorous women over the cars and have not gone into great detail in describing the more technical features of the car. The advertisement captures the consumers attention through the amount of space the advert takes up, only nigh one third of the page is actually taken up by the car. There is a lot of empty space around the car, and because the car is being sold as a small car the visuals support it. Throughout the advert it stresses the point that the car is small and alliance. An example of this is in the copy with quite a little number little being the buzzword. The advert shows individualism. Draping models over our cars has never been our style. This advertisement is also targeted towards first beat buyers as it repeats special edition twice and it has minor deta ils on price in the fine print under the normal print.In conclusion both adverts are aimed towards a rather different audience but both seem affective in what they have roach out to do. Advertisement 1 tells of the car being small and compact and shows it many ways, whilst advert 2 tells and shows of the car being large and sports like and shows it using more frames then print. I could see a lot of people reading these adverts and wanting to buy the cars. There fourth I think that both advertisement companies do well in what they have set out to do.