.

Monday, May 6, 2019

Saudi Arabia - Trade Elasticity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Saudi Arabia - Trade Elasticity - Essay ExampleFrequently, trade elasticities atomic number 18 needed for answering policy questions regarding a country and for making judgments regarding a countrys genuinely exchange rate (Billmeier & Hakura, 2008).It should be noted that, trade elasticities need to be estimated with respect to foreign, national ask and the real exchange rate and factors such as energy prices across the world. When estimating trade elasticities, several choices mustiness be made including long-term factors that drive export and importee posit. Secondly, it is important to ascertain how the recent international trade flows are dominant in these estimates. Additionally, trade elasticities are also depended on relative prices, demand, and indwelling resource endowment, particularly, energy such as vegetable oil (Billmeier & Hakura, 2008). In Saudi Arabia, the walkover of export and import demand changes with variations in foreign and domestic demand. Imports, in particular, appear to be more inelastic with regards to domestic demand. This is because demand is mostly geared towards goods that are domestically produced. Interestingly, Saudi Arabian imports are, to a much larger extent, dominated by energy imports, particularly oil. Imports increase by 2.2 percent when the real price of oil increases by 10 percent (Billmeier & Hakura, 2008). However, both exports and imports react in the same way to foreign demand and domestic demand, respectively. To calculate import and export elasticities for Saudi Arabia, this paper will utilize results from the production theory. using Hotellings lemma, the general-equilibrium supply function can be obtained from a derivative of a countrys GDP function with regard to output prices. Demand function for inputs can also be obtained in this similar way, and as such, import elasticity can be estimated. Saudi Arabian import elasticity according to (Billmeier & Hakura, 2008) is -1.915553. This is a negative and is assumed to be with the wrong sign

No comments:

Post a Comment