.

Sunday, March 17, 2019

Homosexuality and Misogyny in Frankenstein Essay -- Frankenstein essay

Homosexuality and Misogyny in Frankenstein In bloody shame Shelleys novel, Victor Frankenstein suffers an extreme psychological crisis following his violation of what is considered a fundamental biological principle. His creation of look undermines the role of women in his life and the role of sexuality, and allows existing misogynist and homosexual tendencies to surface. Victor represses what he has exposed about himself, and it merges into a cohesive whole in his psyche that becomes communicate on the instrument of revelation, the monstrosity. Victors creation allows him to split his sexuality into independent components. there are three fundamental purposes to sexuality presented in Mary Shelleys register the psychological benefits of companionship, the unique physical pleasures of sexuality, and the desire to pass on ones genes and behaviors with procreation. In social animals, the process of choosing partners for sexual intercourse and companionship is founded on repr oductive goals. Victors ability to create life independently eliminates the importance of training in choosing companions and sexual partners. Each of the three elements of Victors sexuality become separated, and thusly associated with his principal contemporaries, the people closest to him Henry Clerval as companionship, Elizabeth Lavenza as reproduction, and the monster as sexual pleasure. Elizabeth at one time or some other represents all female roles to Victor. In turn, she is Victors cousin, sister, mother, and wife. These are not figurative relationships, implied by the text they are actual labels applied to Elizabeth, by Victors parents while he is still a child. When she joins the family, she is his cousin, a... ... kill his brother, and to be rid of Elizabeth and also of the contrast that his relationship with Clerval brings. The implication is that anyone who follows the split to its logical conclusion will gravel themselves in crisis, when they inevitably upset the ir mental balance, as Frankenstein did in rejecting women. kit and boodle Cited Lowe-Evans, Mary. Frankenstein Mary Shellys Wedding Guest. New York Twayne Publishers, 1993. Maslow. A.H A theory of human motivation (Psycol. Rev, 50, 370-396, 1943) Oates, Joyce Carol. Frankenstein Creation as Catastrophe. Mary Shellys Frankenstein. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York Chelsea House Publishers, 1987. Shelly, Mary. Frankenstein Or the Modern Prometheus. New York Penguin Books, 1978. Tropp, Martin. Mary Shellys Monster. Boston Houghton Mifflin, 1976.

No comments:

Post a Comment